So our interview is tomorrow, we have our binder of docs and front loaded our application. I think we are fully prepared for any questions during the interview, except one. My husband was out of status for 4 years before we got married and worked without authorization. The lawyer we hired to review our docs said to disclose that on the application, plus they would see his tax returns anyway. Has anyone who has gone though the interview been asked about this? Our plan was to answer that he needed to financially support himself during that time, but wanted to know if anyone else had experience with this?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Interview Tomorrow / worked while out of status
Collapse
X
-
Interview Tomorrow / worked while out of status
11/20/17 - PD - Marriage Based AOS
12/10/17 - Walk in Biometrics
4/10/18 - EAD & AP Approved
4/18/18 - Interview ready to be scheduled
4/19/18 - Combo Card in hand
10/22/18 - Interview has been scheduled
11/26/18 - Interview Completed
12/6/18 - GC in handTags: None
-
Originally posted by ChicagoVB View PostSo our interview is tomorrow, we have our binder of docs and front loaded our application. I think we are fully prepared for any questions during the interview, except one. My husband was out of status for 4 years before we got married and worked without authorization. The lawyer we hired to review our docs said to disclose that on the application, plus they would see his tax returns anyway. Has anyone who has gone though the interview been asked about this? Our plan was to answer that he needed to financially support himself during that time, but wanted to know if anyone else had experience with this?
It sounds like worked using an ITIN and that's fine. The Officer may verify with your husband when and where he worked OR they may not even get to that question. Given that you front-loaded your application, and are bringing a boat-load of evidence to the interview, I anticipate you will likely be approved on the spot or shortly after the interview.
All the best,
USCFFS
-
Ok, thanks! Nothing was counterfeit and it was all under the SSN provided to him with his first work approval11/20/17 - PD - Marriage Based AOS
12/10/17 - Walk in Biometrics
4/10/18 - EAD & AP Approved
4/18/18 - Interview ready to be scheduled
4/19/18 - Combo Card in hand
10/22/18 - Interview has been scheduled
11/26/18 - Interview Completed
12/6/18 - GC in hand
Comment
-
He said it shouldn't be a big deal, it is a minor infraction, but still a violation of the terms of his visa. So I wanted to ask on here if anyone had actual experience with it.11/20/17 - PD - Marriage Based AOS
12/10/17 - Walk in Biometrics
4/10/18 - EAD & AP Approved
4/18/18 - Interview ready to be scheduled
4/19/18 - Combo Card in hand
10/22/18 - Interview has been scheduled
11/26/18 - Interview Completed
12/6/18 - GC in hand
Comment
-
Originally posted by ChicagoVB View PostHe said it shouldn't be a big deal, it is a minor infraction, but still a violation of the terms of his visa. So I wanted to ask on here if anyone had actual experience with it.
Comment
-
Where did you read that?
We were told it will likely not be an issue but under the new administration minor infractions that were let go before are being more scrutinized11/20/17 - PD - Marriage Based AOS
12/10/17 - Walk in Biometrics
4/10/18 - EAD & AP Approved
4/18/18 - Interview ready to be scheduled
4/19/18 - Combo Card in hand
10/22/18 - Interview has been scheduled
11/26/18 - Interview Completed
12/6/18 - GC in hand
Comment
-
Originally posted by ChicagoVB View PostWhere did you read that?
We were told it will likely not be an issue but under the new administration minor infractions that were let go before are being more scrutinized
Comment
-
I found it, thanks! It is under Section 245 k
B. Immediate Relatives
Certain adjustment bars do not apply to an immediate relative, including the spouse or child (unmarried and under 21 years old) of a U.S. citizen, and the parent of a U.S. citizen older than 21. [2]
An adjustment applicant applying as an immediate relative may be eligible to adjust status even if:
?The applicant is now employed or has ever been employed in the United States without authorization;
?The applicant is not in lawful immigration status on the date he or she files the adjustment application;
?The applicant has ever failed to continuously maintain a lawful status since entry into the United States;
?The applicant was last admitted to Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) as a visitor under the Guam or CNMI Visa Waiver Program and is not a Canadian citizen;
?The applicant was last admitted to the United States as a nonimmigrant visitor without a visa under the Visa Waiver Program; or
?The applicant has ever violated the terms of his or her nonimmigrant status.11/20/17 - PD - Marriage Based AOS
12/10/17 - Walk in Biometrics
4/10/18 - EAD & AP Approved
4/18/18 - Interview ready to be scheduled
4/19/18 - Combo Card in hand
10/22/18 - Interview has been scheduled
11/26/18 - Interview Completed
12/6/18 - GC in hand
Comment
-
Originally posted by ChicagoVB View PostI found it, thanks! It is under Section 245 k
B. Immediate Relatives
Certain adjustment bars do not apply to an immediate relative, including the spouse or child (unmarried and under 21 years old) of a U.S. citizen, and the parent of a U.S. citizen older than 21. [2]
An adjustment applicant applying as an immediate relative may be eligible to adjust status even if:
?The applicant is now employed or has ever been employed in the United States without authorization;
?The applicant is not in lawful immigration status on the date he or she files the adjustment application;
?The applicant has ever failed to continuously maintain a lawful status since entry into the United States;
?The applicant was last admitted to Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) as a visitor under the Guam or CNMI Visa Waiver Program and is not a Canadian citizen;
?The applicant was last admitted to the United States as a nonimmigrant visitor without a visa under the Visa Waiver Program; or
?The applicant has ever violated the terms of his or her nonimmigrant status.
Comment
Comment