OP, since you have already provided a lot of information. Maybe sorry, if you could explain more to us the actual orginial greencard process. That way we can analyze what possible evidence you have or so.
You mention you knew each other for 4 years, then got married? Did you have the child before marriage then? When did your marriage start, how long were you married before the day of your AOS interview?
You mention everything leads back to financially. Unfortunately that is the reality in USCIS mind the day you are married on paper is the day financially you should start to commingle and by the time your reach ROC heck everything should be joint in their minds.
So what evidence exactly did you mainly use at your AOS interview, what commingled docuements was there at the time. Were you living together at the time? When did you stop living together? Did you move out then divorce? Or divorce then move out? How long after divorce did you decide to seperate financially? Maybe you seperated financially before divorce was finalized?
Basically, look at this way you mention your AOS interview was "through and firm" aka no fun, cause very likely your evidence was light. Now at ROC you still have light evidence and possibly lacking continous evidence. So in reality you have less evidence than AOS? This alone is the only thing I can see why your dumbass lawyer said try to prove hardship and base everything on the child.
In USCIS mind you need to prove, one you knew each other. Two, you entered into marriage in good faith and AOS process for right reasons. Three, after all one and two are true, you at some point later on seperated in all ways (key being financially). It seems your lawyer failed to prove 1 and 2, forget getting to #3. and moved the focus on hardship of the child.
You mention you knew each other for 4 years, then got married? Did you have the child before marriage then? When did your marriage start, how long were you married before the day of your AOS interview?
You mention everything leads back to financially. Unfortunately that is the reality in USCIS mind the day you are married on paper is the day financially you should start to commingle and by the time your reach ROC heck everything should be joint in their minds.
So what evidence exactly did you mainly use at your AOS interview, what commingled docuements was there at the time. Were you living together at the time? When did you stop living together? Did you move out then divorce? Or divorce then move out? How long after divorce did you decide to seperate financially? Maybe you seperated financially before divorce was finalized?
Basically, look at this way you mention your AOS interview was "through and firm" aka no fun, cause very likely your evidence was light. Now at ROC you still have light evidence and possibly lacking continous evidence. So in reality you have less evidence than AOS? This alone is the only thing I can see why your dumbass lawyer said try to prove hardship and base everything on the child.
In USCIS mind you need to prove, one you knew each other. Two, you entered into marriage in good faith and AOS process for right reasons. Three, after all one and two are true, you at some point later on seperated in all ways (key being financially). It seems your lawyer failed to prove 1 and 2, forget getting to #3. and moved the focus on hardship of the child.
Comment