I am a US citizen and filed an I-130 for my wife in Nov 2017. We live in Los Angeles. Had an interview in Oct 2018. Had not heard anything after that. So, we sought help from my local US Congressperson a month ago. Got a letter from Immigration today setting up an interview - i.e. a second one.
The appointment letter asks for ID and (non-specific) documents proving our marriage. It does not mention the first interview. It does not say this is a Stokes interview. I read that "The origins of the Stokes interview can be found in the federal district court decision of Stokes v. INS. Under this case, when an immigration officer questions the validity of a marriage in an I-130 spouse petition, the applicant must be provided with a written notice describing the rights of the parties involved, a separate attachment of the list of rights with the appointment letter, and a list of what documents to submit at the time of the interview, such as bank statements, pay stubs, ...
Is this second interview a Stokes interview?
During the first interview, they talked with my wife only. When they were done, they told us to go home. That is, they never talked to me.
The appointment letter asks for ID and (non-specific) documents proving our marriage. It does not mention the first interview. It does not say this is a Stokes interview. I read that "The origins of the Stokes interview can be found in the federal district court decision of Stokes v. INS. Under this case, when an immigration officer questions the validity of a marriage in an I-130 spouse petition, the applicant must be provided with a written notice describing the rights of the parties involved, a separate attachment of the list of rights with the appointment letter, and a list of what documents to submit at the time of the interview, such as bank statements, pay stubs, ...
Is this second interview a Stokes interview?
During the first interview, they talked with my wife only. When they were done, they told us to go home. That is, they never talked to me.
Comment