Hello Everyone,
I have a curious question that I am hoping someone can shed some light on.
I have been in the US for 6 years on an L-1B visa (yes, I know, L-1B is only for 5 years, but what can I say, USCIS in London messed up...). Through work I have travelled extensively and accumulated nearly 2 years of time for recapture.
I recently applied for a recapture of time and didn't expect any problems, however I received an RFE asking me to prove my status as a specialized knowledge employee.
This confused me greatly. Why would they ask me to prove my specialized knowledge qualification if USCIS itself had previously approved two L-1B visa's in the past, for which I was requesting a recapture of time for? The RFE was a 6 page document suggesting I supply this, that, and the other, to prove my worthiness, which I see as completely pointless.
My attorney doesn't know the answer. My suggestion is to simply respond along the lines of 'we aren't requesting a new L1 visa, just a recapture of time on an existing L1 visa, therefore USCIS approval of that visa is sufficient enough evidence that the beneficiary qualifies'. We could provide the signed sheet from my L1 interview showing the L1 was approved, and surely that should be enough....?
Looking forward to your response!
HollywoodBrit
I have a curious question that I am hoping someone can shed some light on.
I have been in the US for 6 years on an L-1B visa (yes, I know, L-1B is only for 5 years, but what can I say, USCIS in London messed up...). Through work I have travelled extensively and accumulated nearly 2 years of time for recapture.
I recently applied for a recapture of time and didn't expect any problems, however I received an RFE asking me to prove my status as a specialized knowledge employee.
This confused me greatly. Why would they ask me to prove my specialized knowledge qualification if USCIS itself had previously approved two L-1B visa's in the past, for which I was requesting a recapture of time for? The RFE was a 6 page document suggesting I supply this, that, and the other, to prove my worthiness, which I see as completely pointless.
My attorney doesn't know the answer. My suggestion is to simply respond along the lines of 'we aren't requesting a new L1 visa, just a recapture of time on an existing L1 visa, therefore USCIS approval of that visa is sufficient enough evidence that the beneficiary qualifies'. We could provide the signed sheet from my L1 interview showing the L1 was approved, and surely that should be enough....?
Looking forward to your response!
HollywoodBrit
Comment