Hi all,
Not sure if any body has posted this concern earlier. My "B1 in lieu of H1B" Visa got rejected last year (mid July) citing clause 214(B). I have no clue why they rejected my VISA. The counsular officer didnt ask me any questions, he kept me for admin processing and later rejected.
i am working for India division of a reputed US multinational. Now my company intends to process my L1 VISA.
Now here are my queries?
1. Is Clause 214(B) a show stopper if I apply L1-B visa?
Clause 214(B) states that I have failed to impress upon the consular officer that I have no intention in abandoning my residence in India(ie I intend to immigrate). But i understand the L1-B is a dual intend VISA, ie person applying could have the intend to immigrate
2. In this scenario is it advisable for me to go with L1- Individual instead of L1-Blanket?
Request your valuable suggestions/opinion
Not sure if any body has posted this concern earlier. My "B1 in lieu of H1B" Visa got rejected last year (mid July) citing clause 214(B). I have no clue why they rejected my VISA. The counsular officer didnt ask me any questions, he kept me for admin processing and later rejected.
i am working for India division of a reputed US multinational. Now my company intends to process my L1 VISA.
Now here are my queries?
1. Is Clause 214(B) a show stopper if I apply L1-B visa?
Clause 214(B) states that I have failed to impress upon the consular officer that I have no intention in abandoning my residence in India(ie I intend to immigrate). But i understand the L1-B is a dual intend VISA, ie person applying could have the intend to immigrate
2. In this scenario is it advisable for me to go with L1- Individual instead of L1-Blanket?
Request your valuable suggestions/opinion
Comment