My Wife studying master's at university taking full-time courses on H4 visa for Fall 2007 & Spring 2008. In May 2008, we went to Mexico to Change status from H4 to F1 (So F1 effective from Summer). In summer she is
maintaining required hours to be full-time student. She is planning to apply for CPT from August 2008 (Fall Semester) but the school is denying saying that they wrongly advised her before and because she got F1 visa by
traveling, somehow the full-time study she did on H4 does not count and she has to put in 9 more months of full-time study to be eligibe either for CPT/OPT. Is this accurate? They say that if she had applied for change of status by staying in USA, then she would have been fine. According to CPT/OPT eligibility rules per USCIS site, as long as a candidate has put in 9 consecutive months of full-time study in a valid non-immigrant
status (H4 is valid) and is on F1 at the time of application and never been out of status is eligible for CPT/OPT. Please advise if anyone even heard of this. I researched web for days and yet to find anything on this. Interestingly school is yet to show any legal rule to substantiate their view point.
maintaining required hours to be full-time student. She is planning to apply for CPT from August 2008 (Fall Semester) but the school is denying saying that they wrongly advised her before and because she got F1 visa by
traveling, somehow the full-time study she did on H4 does not count and she has to put in 9 more months of full-time study to be eligibe either for CPT/OPT. Is this accurate? They say that if she had applied for change of status by staying in USA, then she would have been fine. According to CPT/OPT eligibility rules per USCIS site, as long as a candidate has put in 9 consecutive months of full-time study in a valid non-immigrant
status (H4 is valid) and is on F1 at the time of application and never been out of status is eligible for CPT/OPT. Please advise if anyone even heard of this. I researched web for days and yet to find anything on this. Interestingly school is yet to show any legal rule to substantiate their view point.
Comment