To The VO (The poem was written by me after Visa denial under 214 b; Was it fair?)

[Jai Kumar Garg]

Flawed Perceptions

Incredible thoughts
Unimaginable conjunctures
Section 214 (b) confers the desire
For immigration to non immigration applicants?

Under stated will
When you assume one leaves home for good
For a barren land not theirs
To be a non entity, secondary to all;

Why would one go
If not for the pleasure and friendship
Force any one to care of them
If one is just a pauper in his life with no work;

What can bind one
To alien land for even that month
And seek immigration status
When they cant stay from their home within their country.

Love to respect
Are ***** words we always relish
You can place barriers at will
Only I know my intent was pure: but how could you?

[immihelp]

Wah wah!!

Keep the good job. You have an exciting alternate carreer.

[Jai Kumar Garg]

214 (b) (The poem I wanted to post in the experience section but could not so do it )

Don't shoot me down with your neat coded numbers
Inhuman measures non corrupted style
I can't get blown over by US beauties
For the one I love is already mine.

Look at your blonde hair with hardly a face
Heard "why the visit to US" she called out
I replied "tourism is my intent madam
Pleasure with friends, no business for sure".

"Relations! of course carol's my net friend"
Immediate relations never a niece
For I had cajoled DS-160 to kindly accept
But it hadn't bulged from its predefined stand.

"Ok what you do", I said "cinema-movie"
"You own it" I said "yes" a bit surprised
"Since when" was her shot and I cry "child hood"
"1962" in my consciousness as I blurted it out.

"What does your friend do" I said "works" loudly
"Where" and I told what I knew there and then
Remembered the place, city to name them;
Seconds begin to tick like a time bomb.

With clicks she uploads a coded disaster
Take this 214 -b active and duly registered
And when you can decode the puzzle reapply
Public response -New Delhi Discretion-:

Now left, decry this immigration tag;
Certification:"courtesy VO's gag"

[Jai Kumar Garg]

Wah wah!!

Keep the good job. You have an exciting alternate carreer.

Thanks for the comments, as it is I am charged with immigrant intent. Lol and with your work suggestion I can be charged and also called an illegal immigrant doing work with out a visa hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahah.
I just joke, but thanks for making me feel better.

[Jai Kumar Garg]

The Point That Hurts

I totally believe that as an intending B1-B2 visitor to the US, it is the prerogative of the host country (as in this case the US ) to allow or not to allow a visa; both morally and legally.
The unchallenged discretion of the embassy where one applies:

A refusal without assigning a reason is excellent as long as one is not assumed to be a liar both morally or legally if we really have any care for human values.

Moreover,
The US Law 214 (b) presumes every non immigrant applicant who goes for pleasure and to meet friends.....to be an intending immigrant.........etc etc!

So the moment you apply for a US visa under B1-B2 in DS-160 the Visa Officer is bound to consider you a liar applying for nonimmigrant visa under this category, until you can prove it other wise.

At interviews, the DS-160 becomes the main document and what they ask you becomes the only source, beside prior intelligence etc......etc, they have on their computers...., for the Visa Officer to develop their assumptions to confirm or reject this immigrant category and decide to give or refuse the visa (all done within a span of around five minutes).

Morally, it is fine to refuse a visa and also not give the applicant any reason why. So when the VFS help desk says in their public response".......visa refusal is based on the discretion of the Embassy." it is good.

Legally, when you are not even asked to prove your links to your home country and the VO has a free hand to ask or not even attempt to ascertain this where is the transparency in all this by US Law under section 214 (b)?


Further, when the Visa Officer is already bound by law to assume all non immigrant applications as intending immigrants, and he hardly has time, where does justice and human ethics go? and when there is no appeal in a US court or any US administration process against this biased section 214 (b) of US Law.......is it fair to the applicant?

In any event, the Embassy Visa Officers are forced into a decesion due to law, short time they have and the quantity of people to certify the applicant to be a liar when they reject the applicant's visa and provide him with the 214 (b) booklet as reasons that he is an intending immigrant......!

Refusal of a visa is no insult; but this certification of the applicant to be a liar definitely IS.