My wife (a green card holder by marriage) and I (citizen) are helping her parents to apply for a visa to visit us. They don't speak English. They own a house and have substantial savings in their home country. Her mother has been here once for several months and went back, when my wife was still a student. Her father has never been here. The real catch is that my wife is pregnant. My understanding is that the reasons for rejection, in descending order of likelihood, are:
1. Being found out lying about pregnancy: possible permanent rejection (retroactively?)
2. Being honest about pregnancy; parents are visiting for their grandchild's birth, emotional support of mother, tourism, shopping (no mention of babysitting or cooking): possible rejection by a grumpy officer
3. Not having enough financial support on their own (if we opt not to "sponsor" them): how much is enough?
4. Grumpy officer not liking my wife's green card through marriage, decides to take it out on us all by rejecting parents' visas
My thinking is that if we "sponsor" them, the application gets more complicated, the parents will be more nervous because they won't understand all the documents, and it will look like we're "trying too hard." Which means the officer is likely to think about why, which will lead them to think about pregnancy, which leads to #1 or #2. Whereas if we let them support themselves, it will look like everyday tourism and relative visitation, and the officer probably won't even ask about pregnancy (so only #3 is a possibility).
Does this analysis make sense? Are there better factors to determine whether the pregnancy question will be asked? In either case I expect very specific coaching about how to answer the potential pregnancy question is called for: it would be natural for my in-laws to respond they plan to do baby-sitting and cooking.
Thanks.
1. Being found out lying about pregnancy: possible permanent rejection (retroactively?)
2. Being honest about pregnancy; parents are visiting for their grandchild's birth, emotional support of mother, tourism, shopping (no mention of babysitting or cooking): possible rejection by a grumpy officer
3. Not having enough financial support on their own (if we opt not to "sponsor" them): how much is enough?
4. Grumpy officer not liking my wife's green card through marriage, decides to take it out on us all by rejecting parents' visas
My thinking is that if we "sponsor" them, the application gets more complicated, the parents will be more nervous because they won't understand all the documents, and it will look like we're "trying too hard." Which means the officer is likely to think about why, which will lead them to think about pregnancy, which leads to #1 or #2. Whereas if we let them support themselves, it will look like everyday tourism and relative visitation, and the officer probably won't even ask about pregnancy (so only #3 is a possibility).
Does this analysis make sense? Are there better factors to determine whether the pregnancy question will be asked? In either case I expect very specific coaching about how to answer the potential pregnancy question is called for: it would be natural for my in-laws to respond they plan to do baby-sitting and cooking.
Thanks.
Comment