Hello,
I am visiting Detroit USA along with my wife from 13Th APR 2007 to 1st June 2007(i month and 20 days).I will be visiting near by places in US and also Canada.I need a reliable insurance company's cover for the
period .After going through the experiences of people in the website(immihelp.com),I have decided to ask my son who is in Detroit to purchase the insurance from an US company.Please let me know the following:
1.Can my son purchase the insurance on our behalf?(using his debit card).What is the procedure?Does he need to declare for anything on our behalf?if yes,what is it?
2.How long will it take for him to get the policy document at his address in US?
3.How can we get a valid document for use on the way during journey?
4.In view of the short duration of our visit and also the health condition of myself and my wife, i don't expect any health problem.Hence i would like to go for a higher deductible($2500)so that the premium will be less.However, i would like to have the cover for $100000/-for both of us as a precaution in case something unexpected happens.Where as $2500/- is a risk we can absorb the same is not possible for $1 lac.Please let me know if i am right.
I am very happy to learn that as a insurance advisor you are caring more to the insured than the insurer(company).A company can take a $1 lac expenditure while it could be dis*****us for an individual.While i agree that no body should be allowed to take advantage of a travel insurance to get treatment for an existing disease (no insurer can afford that)at the same time the insurers should not try to avoid claims giving some reason.I find that many unreliable insurers are after business but do not want to come to the rescue of policy holders who had no intention of misuse of cover but had only taken the insurance for an unexpected event.For example denying claim for a so called pre-existing condition even when the latter was not expected for sure to result in a claim to arise during the period of cover.I don't know what is the real situation but if it is true it is very unfair.No applicant for insurance should be expected to give guarantee to the insurance company that nothing will happen.Please let me know what is the reality under such circumstance.This i am asking only with a concern for genuine policy holders who are entitled for value for their investment in medical insurance.
Regards,
I am visiting Detroit USA along with my wife from 13Th APR 2007 to 1st June 2007(i month and 20 days).I will be visiting near by places in US and also Canada.I need a reliable insurance company's cover for the
period .After going through the experiences of people in the website(immihelp.com),I have decided to ask my son who is in Detroit to purchase the insurance from an US company.Please let me know the following:
1.Can my son purchase the insurance on our behalf?(using his debit card).What is the procedure?Does he need to declare for anything on our behalf?if yes,what is it?
2.How long will it take for him to get the policy document at his address in US?
3.How can we get a valid document for use on the way during journey?
4.In view of the short duration of our visit and also the health condition of myself and my wife, i don't expect any health problem.Hence i would like to go for a higher deductible($2500)so that the premium will be less.However, i would like to have the cover for $100000/-for both of us as a precaution in case something unexpected happens.Where as $2500/- is a risk we can absorb the same is not possible for $1 lac.Please let me know if i am right.
I am very happy to learn that as a insurance advisor you are caring more to the insured than the insurer(company).A company can take a $1 lac expenditure while it could be dis*****us for an individual.While i agree that no body should be allowed to take advantage of a travel insurance to get treatment for an existing disease (no insurer can afford that)at the same time the insurers should not try to avoid claims giving some reason.I find that many unreliable insurers are after business but do not want to come to the rescue of policy holders who had no intention of misuse of cover but had only taken the insurance for an unexpected event.For example denying claim for a so called pre-existing condition even when the latter was not expected for sure to result in a claim to arise during the period of cover.I don't know what is the real situation but if it is true it is very unfair.No applicant for insurance should be expected to give guarantee to the insurance company that nothing will happen.Please let me know what is the reality under such circumstance.This i am asking only with a concern for genuine policy holders who are entitled for value for their investment in medical insurance.
Regards,
Comment